Page 8 - Archive in reverse date order
P. 8

www.northcrayresidents.org.uk

                                                                                                7 August 2016
            Ms Germaine Asabere,
            Development Control,
            Bexley London Borough
            Civic Offices
            2 Watling Street
            Bexleyheath, DA6 7AT


            Dear Ms. Asabere
                                                  Letter of Objection

            Ref  16/01466/FUL  48  Parsonage  Lane:  conversion  of  existing  dwelling  and  outbuildings,
            reconstruction of existing barn to provide special day school

            This Application is the most inappropriate and potentially damaging application we have seen and
            we  cannot  understand  why  it  was  not  summarily  refused.    Failing  that,  why  was  it  not  given  an
            FULM  designation, signifying its importance, and why was the notification letter to local residents
            so deliberately ‘low-key’ as if to suggest there was just a minor change to the use of the property – a
            question raised by a number of our members?

            The Application fails at every level in that it breaches NPPF Green Belt regulations, would trigger
            the  destruction  of  Bexley’s  Green  Belt,  is  totally  inappropriate  for  the  location,  meets  no  local
            requirement and can claim no ‘special circumstances’.  In addition it would have a devastating effect
            on local residents, the community and users of the locality. It would also cause traffic and parking
            chaos  and  continuous  damage  to  property.    Moreover,  the Application  documents  are  deliberately
            understated, simplistic and inaccurate – no doubt to obscure the true scale of the business venture.

            The reasons for our objection to this Application, and there are many, are fully detailed in the main
            body of this letter.  However, for immediate clarity we have prefaced this with a summary of the key
            issues which just in themselves should cause this Application to be summarily refused.

            •  The property, 48 Parsonage  Lane, is a residential dwelling in a high position centrally within
                Green Belt/Heritage Land and has been so for over 50 years.  It is not a ‘brownfield’ site.

            •  Change  of  use  of  this  site  to  a  high-impact  commercial  venture  breaches  NPPF  Green  Belt
                Guidance and would create a dangerous precedent for other sites along Parsonage Lane and the
                surrounding area – including other residential plots.

            •  The school will have a devastating effect on local residents, particularly those in Parsonage Lane
                but  also  those  in  Cocksure  Lane,  Bunkers  Hill  and  Gattons  Way  who  will  suffer  significant
                increases in traffic flows, noise pollution and, potentially, their property values decreasing as this
                quiet semi-rural idyll is destroyed.

            •  There  are  no  existing  out-buildings  that  can  realistically  be  used  for  school  premises  so
                everything will be ‘new builds’ – again breaching NPPF Green Belt Guidelines.  Moreover, the
                amount of premises required is ridiculously understated.

                                                            1
   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13